Clergy Health — A Mixed Portrait

0
Share:

Studies of clergy beginning in the 1700s consistently found that clergy lived longer than other professionals. But by the middle of the twentieth century something was changing. Clergy could no longer claim that distinction. Indeed, concern about the state of clergy health is mounting steadily — due in part to heightened health consciousness in our culture broadly, but more specifically to the rapidly increasing median age of clergy and skyrocketing health insurance costs in many denominations.

Is there a crisis in clergy health? Several U.S. denominations have intensified their efforts to collect data on the wellbeing of clergy. In August 2008, the General Board of Pension and Health Benefits of The United Methodist Church (General Board) established the Center for Health as a denominational focus on health. This initiative is the umbrella for activities established to track and monitor health data across the UMC. A Church Systems Task Force has been convened to study the effects church systems have on the health of ministers by reviewing essential employment systems and church structures that may affect health, conducting research, and making recommendations. The task force research includes a literature review conducted by the Lewis Center, which has unearthed the following noteworthy information, underscoring the need for additional research.

Clergy suffer high levels of work-related stress. At the same time, however, clergy report the highest level of job satisfaction of any profession.

Overall, the literature points to the need to define clergy health broadly and holistically, as wellbeing. This includes not only traditional medical indices of physical and emotional health, but also self-care practices and access to health care resources, supportive personal and professional relationships, balance and coping skills, positive outlook and attitudes, and a passion for ministry grounded in a robust spiritual life.

With regard to the physical health of clergy, the good news is that clergy still tend to be physically healthier than the general population. The bad news is that’s not saying very much! So, for example, a study of one denomination’s clergy (all male) showed that 23 percent of the clergy were obese (BMI of 30 or more) and 34 percent were overweight (BMI of 25 or more.) [Body Mass Index (BMI) is a number calculated from a person’s weight and height as a reliable indicator of body fat.] But clergy are still less prone to weight problems than the overall population where 33 percent of men are obese and 67 percent overweight. Much the same can be said for a number of other indices of medical risk.

Clergy also tend to do better than the population as a whole with regard to many areas of lifestyle risks. They are far less likely to use tobacco. They are more scrupulous about avoiding risk through safety precautions such as seatbelt use. And while lack of exercise is an issue for clergy, they still compare favorably to the U.S. population as a whole in this regard. However, there is a lack of direct evidence on many medical risks, and much more research is needed to get an accurate portrait of the physical health of clergy.

The emotional health of clergy has been studied far more than their physical health. Stress is a common concern of clergy health literature, which reveals that clergy suffer high levels of work-related stress. At the same time, however, clergy report the highest level of job satisfaction of any profession — 87 percent of clergy are satisfied in their jobs compared to a national average of 43 percent. What can explain this seeming paradox between high career satisfaction and high stress? It may result from a deeply felt sense of vocational calling that yields a purposeful, if urgent, sense of responsibility.

The varied nature of a pastor’s task may actually lessen stress — unless it is accompanied by conflict arising from competing role expectations. In general, the literature shows that stress results less from a myriad of small incidents and more from the larger, ongoing patterns of congregational life — how well the congregation is functioning, the level of morale, and the presence or absence of conflict. This begs the question of whether the declining state of so many mainline congregations is adding to the epidemic of clergy stress.

The tensions around balancing the demands of work and family life are particularly pronounced for clergy. A study of clergy found that pastors in stressful work situations were likely to report problems at home. And the ambiguous boundary for many clergy between work and home life is no doubt a factor.

Interestingly, studies reveal that while physical health tends to decline with advancing age, mental health tends to improve. This is true for clergy and the general population. Several studies have noted that younger pastors suffer more stress and are at greater risk of burnout. While the first year of ministry is difficult regardless of the entrant’s age, older persons entering ministry as a second career are not at the same risk for emotional problems as younger clergy.

Finally, review of the literature of clergy health makes clear that much more research is needed, particularly on issues of physical health and medical concerns. Collecting data on clergy health on a regular and ongoing basis would permit analysis of trends and early detection of problems. There is a specific need for information on the adequacy of access to health care for clergy, particularly those who are geographically isolated. And the implications of itineracy on the physical and mental health of United Methodist clergy are not yet well understood.

In all, the current portrait of clergy health is mixed and also incomplete. The issue warrants increased attention.

Note: The research in this article is drawn from a review of literature on clergy health prepared by the Lewis Center for the General Board of Pension and Health Benefits of The United Methodist Church as a part of a major clergy health initiative undertaken by the General Board. To learn more about the General Board’s Center for Health, visit http://www.gbophb.org/health_welfare/centerforhealth.asp.

Share.

About Author

Joseph E. Arnold is Registrar for Wesley Theological Seminary. He was previously Research Manager for Wesley's Lewis Center for Church Leadership.


Adult Education Studies from the Wesley Ministry NetworkAdult Education Studies from the Wesley Ministry Network

The Wesley Ministry Network brings the best of contemporary Christian scholarship to your congregation’s small groups and adult Bible studies.These video-based group study courses encourage the energetic discussion and personal reflection that are keys to a life of informed discipleship. Courses are designed for use in small groups in a wide range of denominations, but they are also appropriate for individuals seeking self-study opportunities. Learn more now.

Ecumenical studies: Simply Christian: Why Christianity Makes SenseJourney through the PsalmsDevotion to Jesus: The Divinity of Christ in Earliest ChristianitySerious Answers to Hard QuestionsReligion and Science: Pathways to TruthIn God’s TimeA Life Worthy of the GospelWomen Speak of God
United Methodist studies: Methodist Identity — Part 1: Our Story; Part 2: Our BeliefsWesleyan Studies Project — Series I: Methodist History; Series II: Methodist Doctrine; Series III: Methodist Evangelism

The Lewis Center will be closed for Holy Week from noon Thursday. We will reopen Monday, April 22. Dismiss