ISSUE ARCHIVE

What do we know about the differences between men and women serving as lead pastors of large congregations? Not enough. But we do know more now from the United Methodist context because of a project undertaken by the General Board of Higher Education and Ministry.

One component is a survey looking at a host of issues among lead pastors serving churches with membership of 1,000 or more. Surveys went to women serving as lead pastors of churches with 1,000 or more members and a randomly selected sample of men serving churches of this size. The Board contracted with the Lewis Center for Church Leadership to compile the results of the survey. (Links to the survey responses and an analysis by HiRho Park and Susan Willhauck are at the end of this article.) I want to share some observations after reviewing the results and reading the responses.

Similarities

The most striking finding is how similar men and women are as lead pastors of large churches. The median age was 53 for women and 56 for men. The female and male lead pastors tend to match in terms of years since ordination, though women serve slightly more appointments than men before arriving at a large membership church (3.75 appointments for men; 4 appointments for women). Male and female lead pastors report spending their time in similar ways.

Eighty percent of both male and female lead pastors indicate that their leadership style has changed since moving to a large church. And the four most frequently cited areas of leadership change, upon becoming lead pastors of large congregations, are the same for men and women: the impact of working with larger staffs; the increased administrative and diminished pastoral focus; the importance of planning and visioning; and delegation. Women also named as a change the need to become more assertive in their leadership.

The overall similarity among the clergywomen and clergymen is underscored by the fact that statistically significant differences were found in their responses to only a small number of questions related to their leadership. When asked to name the two most challenging issues for them personally in their current appointments, the top two for both groups were church finances and staffing.

Differences

Ninety percent of the women are the first clergywoman to serve their current congregations. While 99 percent of the clergymen are married, only 69 percent of the clergywomen are.

Salaries tend to be comparable for men and women serving comparable size churches. If we divide the list of churches of 1,000 or more members into thirds by size, women lead pastors tend to serve in churches in the middle and lower thirds. Their salaries are comparable to men serving those same size categories. But since women do not tend to serve in churches in the top third of the large churches, the overall averages continue to show lower salaries for all women lead pastors compared to all men lead pastors of large churches.

When asked if they observe gender differences in the leadership of male and female pastors, both male and female lead pastors responded in similar ways. Almost all qualified their comments to avoid blanket generalizations. Men and women were careful to name differences as tendencies they have observed while acknowledging exceptions. One finding looms large and cannot be ignored: there is agreement among men and women that there are different standards for men and women lead pastors, with women having to work harder for acceptance and leadership. Men are given a standing of authority often not present for women.

Conclusion

Although there may be differences between how male and female lead pastors see themselves and function, it appears that the nature and challenges of large church leadership shape the experience of male and female lead pastors in ways that make their leadership more similar than different.

To see the survey results, go to: http://www.gbhem.org/atf/cf/%7B0BCEF929-BDBA-4AA0-968F-D1986A8EEF80%7D/CW_LWPP2009results.pdf

To see an analysis by HiRho Park and Susan Willhauck, go to: http://www.gbhem.org/atf/cf/%7B0BCEF929-BDBA-4AA0-968F-D1986A8EEF80%7D/CW_LWPP2009.pdf

Worship Attendance Data
Offer Clues about Special Days

Last month, the Lewis Center administered a survey about worship attendance on Easter and Christmas Eve. While this was not a scientific survey, the responses do give some clues for church leaders. Some initial observations from the first seventy churches responding are:

• On average, Easter attendance is 180 percent of the previous year’s average worship attendance. The median (half lower, half higher) percentage was also 180 percent. The range was from just over 100 percent to 300 percent.
  
  
• Christmas Eve attendance is on average 150 percent of the previous year’s average worship attendance. The median (half lower, half higher) percentage was also 150 percent. The range was from just under 50 percent to over 300 percent. While all churches had Easter services, many reporting churches did not have Christmas Eve services. And the importance of such services as shown by attendance is far less consistent than with Easter.

Churches without Christmas Eve services may be missing a "53rd Sunday" where many churches show attendance rivaling Easter. And churches with low attendance at Christmas Eve services may want to explore how to enhance their offerings to reach more people. As this database expands, and closer to the time of these two special days, the Lewis Center will provide a more detailed report on the findings and implications of this survey.

Lewis Center Seeks Information on Summer Worship Changes

Do your worship patterns remain the same or change during the summer months? The Lewis Center is seeking to get some idea of the extent and patterns of modifications in things such as the number of worship services, times of services, etc. Please take a moment now to tell us what your church does by using this online survey. We want to hear from you even if you are not making changes.

Lewis Center Launches Facebook Page

This page will allow supporters of the Lewis Center to network with one another and stay up to date with all that the Lewis Center is doing. It will include updates when new Leading Ideas articles are available, as well as posting information on new resource offerings from the Lewis Center. Become a "fan" of the page to stay abreast of developments with the Center. And please invite your colleagues and associates to view the page as well. Click here.

Giving Down but Not to Religion in 2008

Donations to charitable causes in the United States exceeded $300 billion in 2008; but this represented a 2 percent drop in current dollars from 2007. The 2008 number is the first decline in charitable giving in current dollars since 1987 and only the second since Giving USA began publishing annual reports in 1956, says their most recent report on philanthropy. Two-thirds of public charities receiving donations saw decreases in 2008. However, an encouraging sign for church leaders is that giving to religion was one of the few exceptions to the downward trend.

Update is a monthly report to subscribers of Leading Ideas
on the work of the Lewis Center for Church Leadership.